Review 01
Candidate funding was not a substitute for electoral reach.
Daniel Kowal won the certified District 4 primary with 8,957 votes and 70.6499%. Daniel Zegarac received 3,721 votes, 29.3501%, and won none of 17 reporting precincts. Despite radically different funding sources, receipts per vote were nearly equal: $6.41 for Kowal and $6.56 for Zegarac. The observable separation was spending efficiency and reach: 268.43 votes per $1,000 spent for Kowal versus 214.53 for Zegarac.
What the result means
Receipts alone would have missed the useful distinction. Funding origin differed sharply, receipts per vote did not, and Zegarac’s campaign still failed to carry a single precinct. The record supports a reach-and-execution diagnosis, not a causal claim about why voters chose Kowal.
What it does not prove
The result is descriptive. It does not prove that funding source or expenditure efficiency caused any vote, and the official export does not expose contest-specific ballot totals, undervotes or overvotes.
