Naples Design District · public scrutiny system
One public evidence spine, four reviewer-specific tests, one challenge log, and no borrowed certainty.
The Scrutiny Room publishes review structure, public claims, public source gaps, and pack manifests. It does not publish controlled Gibbs material, private correspondence, bidder strategy, client information, investment recommendations, or an implied endorsement.
Bob Gibbs / Gibbs Planning Group
Test the retail baseline, geography, methodology, date, permissions, and which conclusions can be reproduced from the authoritative package.
Naples Design District association and district stakeholders
Test stakeholder descriptions, governance claims, geography, priorities, implementation status, and the distinction between association context and public authority.
Naples City Council, CRA, staff, and the public
Test authority, procurement, money class, decision clock, limitations, independence, conflicts, accessibility, and the exact record supporting each public statement.
Current and prospective public-procurement participants
Test procurement neutrality, document-chain completeness, role separation, money classification, and whether the Desk avoids nonpublic competitive information.
Source-gap register
A gap closes only when the exact required artifact or record is preserved, versioned, hashed, and reviewed. Conversation and proximity do not close it.
Owner Evidence acquisition
Closes with Exact PDF, appendices, version metadata, page index, SHA-256, and reviewed geography crosswalk
Owner Evidence acquisition
Closes with Signed document, exhibits, scope, compensation, approval, clerk metadata, and SHA-256
Owner Gibbs review
Closes with Exact report, model, geography, date, methodology, permissions, and reviewer disposition
Owner Evidence acquisition
Closes with Versioned parcel universe, title/ownership cut, exceptions, study areas, project limits, and association geography
Owner Evidence acquisition
Closes with Executed closing statement, deed, current title, carrying cost, use decision, and disposition authority
Owner Evidence acquisition
Closes with Base agreement and amendments reconciled to invoices, approvals, payments, encumbrances, balances, scope, schedule, and completion proof
Reviewer challenge log
Resolved means the wording or control is fixed. It does not mean the underlying project, contract, title, payment, or market question is resolved.
The locator is preserved; plan language, page references, legal boundary, and methodology remain unusable until the exact artifact is frozen.
The official index and service term are visible. Signed bytes, compensation, complete scope, invoices, and payments remain open.
No market figure or conclusion is published. The graph exposes only the controlled gap.
The current orientation is schematic stakeholder context; it is not a legal, assessment, entitlement, ownership, or project-limit boundary.
Public wording is limited to Council authorization; closing, deed, title, carrying cost, use, disposition, and performance terms remain open.
No. Each amount remains in its distinct economic class and separate claim lineage.
No. The Source Room and Decision Graph preserve those as separate missing records.
The graph keeps the current critical path open until a dated authoritative baseline resolves scope, schedule, cost chain, and completion proof.